Palleson

Palleson v. Boston Scientific Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20213:21-cv-01037California4,233 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SARAH PALLESON, Case No. 21-cv-1037-MMA (RBB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC [Doc. No. 9]

CORPORATION,

15 Defendant. 16 17 On June 1, 2021, Sarah Palleson (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against Boston Scientific Corporation (“Defendant”) alleging four causes of action under California law: (1) strict liability for failure to warn; (2) strict liability for a manufacturing defect; (3) negligence; and (4) negligent misrepresentation. Doc. No. 1 (“Compl.”). Defendant now moves to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Doc. No. 9. Plaintiff filed an opposition, to which Defendant replied. See Doc. Nos. 10, 11. The Court found the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. See Doc. No. 12. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.