San Diego County Credit Union v. Citizens Equity First Credit Union
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN DIEGO COUNTY CREDIT Case No.: 18cv967-GPC(RBB)
UNION,
ORDER DIRECTING SDCCU TO
Plaintiff, PROVIDE SECOND v. SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION
CITIZENS EQUITY FIRST CREDIT
UNION,
16 Defendant.
18 In the supplemental briefing on SDCCU’s motion for attorneys’ fees, CEFCU 19 objects to the declaration of Jesse Salen arguing he has no personal knowledge of what 20 amount of time each attorney devoted to the tasks identified in the billing record and no 21 evidence to support the apportionment for certain entries. (Dkt. No. 386 at 9-10, 16.) 22 SDCCU responds that it has provided admissible evidence based on its billing records. 23 (Dkt. No. 390 at 4 (citing Gonzalez v. City of Maywood, 729 F.3d 1196, 1202 (9th Cir. 24 2013) (“[T]o determine whether attorneys for the prevailing party could have reasonably 25 billed the hours they claim to their private clients, the district court should begin with the 26 billing records the prevailing party has submitted.”).)…