J.R.
J.R. v. San Marcos Unified School District
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 J.R., by and through her Guardians ad Case No.: 21-CV-1752 JLS (AGS) Litem; NICOLE REED; and RONALD
REED, ORDER (1) DENYING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S EX Plaintiffs,
PARTE APPLICATION TO EXTEND
14 v. TIME; (2) SUA SPONTE STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S EXHIBIT 15; AND (3)
SAN MARCOS UNIFIED SCHOOL
ORDERING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
DISTRICT,
OAH’S RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S
Defendant. MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
18 (ECF No. 25) 19 20 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application to Extend the Briefing Schedule (“Appl.,” ECF No. 25). Plaintiff requests the Court “extend the briefing schedule to ten (10) calendar days following [Office of Administrative Hearings (“]OAH’s[”)] ruling on Plaintiff’s Motion for Clarification.” Appl. at 2. For the following reasons, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s Application. “In our adversary…