Rapinoe
Rapinoe v. San Diego County Sheriffs Officer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN JAMES RAPINOE, Case No. 21cv1162-DMS (RBM)
BOOKING #20944775,
ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL
Plaintiff, ACTION FOR FAILING vs. TO PROSECUTE IN COMPLIANCE
WITH COURT ORDER
SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF’S
REQUIRING AMENDMENT OFFICE, et al., Defendants. 17 18 On June 23, 2021, Plaintiff Brian James Rapino, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming he was denied proper medical care because his knee injury was not properly evaluated, his inmate grievances were not properly handled, and the San Diego Sheriff’s Office implemented a no-narcotics policy which prevented doctors from providing proper medical care where narcotic pain medication is required. (ECF No. 1 at 2-5.) Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. Section 1914(a) at the time of filing and instead filed a Motion to Proceed In…