Wolf

Smith v. Wolf

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20213:20-cv-01409California1,789 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 G. SMITH, Case No.: 3:20-cv-1409-JAH-JLB Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DISMISSING IN PART

PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED

DANIEL WOLF and COMPLAINT [ECF No. 11]

PAUL BEDINGTON,

15 Defendants. 16 I. INTRODUCTION On July 22, 2020, G. Smith (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint seeking damages against Daniel Wolf and Paul Bedington (“Defendants”) for seven California state law claims: (1) Breach of Contract, (2) Assault, (3) Trespass, (4) Trespass to Chattels, (5) Conversion, (6) Abuse of Process, and (7) Unjust Enrichment. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff concurrently filed a Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF No. 2). On October 28, 2020, this Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP and dismissed Plaintiff’s Complaint in part without prejudice pursuant to U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.