Wolf
Smith v. Wolf
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 G. SMITH, Case No.: 3:20-cv-1409-JAH-JLB Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DISMISSING IN PART
PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED
DANIEL WOLF and COMPLAINT [ECF No. 11]
PAUL BEDINGTON,
15 Defendants. 16 I. INTRODUCTION On July 22, 2020, G. Smith (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint seeking damages against Daniel Wolf and Paul Bedington (“Defendants”) for seven California state law claims: (1) Breach of Contract, (2) Assault, (3) Trespass, (4) Trespass to Chattels, (5) Conversion, (6) Abuse of Process, and (7) Unjust Enrichment. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff concurrently filed a Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF No. 2). On October 28, 2020, this Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP and dismissed Plaintiff’s Complaint in part without prejudice pursuant to U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). (ECF…