Moreno

Moreno v. Vi-Jon, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20213:20-cv-01446California6,856 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ANTHONY MORENO, individually, and Case No.: 20cv1446 JM(BGS) on behalf of others similarly situated,

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Plaintiff, SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT v.

VI-JON, LLC.,

13 Defendant.

15 Presently before the court is Defendant Vi-Jon, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint, filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b), 12(b)(1), and 12(b)(6). (Doc. No. 24.) The motion has been fully briefed and the court finds it suitable for submission on the papers and without oral argument in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion is granted. I. BACKGROUND On July 27, 2020, Plaintiff filed a consumer class action complaint against Defendant, seeking damages and equitable relief for the alleged false and misleading labeling on Defendant’s hand sanitizing products. (Doc. No. 1, at ¶¶ 1-8.) The complaint alleged violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.