Kelly

Kelly v. Hickman

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20213:21-cv-01226California605 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY KELLY, Case No.: 3:21-cv-01226-BEN-MDD

Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION PARTIALLY

GRANTING AND PARTIALLY

RANDALL MARK HICKMAN,

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

Defendant/Judgment Debtor. FOR ASSIGNMENT ORDER AND

ORDER RESTRAINING

JUDGMENT DEBTOR

17 [ECF No. 4, 10]

19 On May 26, 2021, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Assignment Order and Order 20 Restraining Judgment Debtor. ECF No. 4. Defendants did not file an opposition. 21 On September 30, 2021, Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin issued a thoughtful 22 and thorough Report and Recommendation, recommending that this Court partially grant 23 Plaintiff’s motion for assignment order and order restraining judgment debtor. ECF No. 24 10. Magistrate Judge Dembin’s analysis on California law provides specific and 25 convincing reasons regarding the treatment of wages and stimulus checks under California 26 law for purposes of satisfying a money judgment.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.