Hicks
Hicks v. Clayton
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20213:21-cv-01866California1,558 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL HICKS, Case No.: 21-CV-1866 JLS (WVG)
CDCR #B-80852,
ORDER (1) DENYING MOTION TO
Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS vs. AS BARRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)
AND (2) DISMISSING CIVIL
ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PAY
D. CLAYTON, et al.,
FILING FEE REQUIRED BY
Defendants. U.S.C. § 1914(a) 17 (ECF No. 2) 19 20 Plaintiff Michael Hicks, proceeding pro se and currently incarcerated at Richard J. Donovan State Prison, has filed a civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See Compl., ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee required to commence a civil action; instead, he has filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (See ECF No. 2.) /// /// /// MOTION TO PROCEED IFP I. Standard of Review “All persons, not just prisoners, may seek…