Carter
EpicentRx, Inc. v. Carter
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EPICENTRX, INC., a Delaware Case No.: 20-CV-1058 TWR (LL) corporation,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, EX PARTE APPLICATION v. OBJECTING TO MAGISTRATE
JUDGE LOPEZ’S DISCOVERY
COREY A. CARTER, M.D.,
ORDER Defendant/Counter-Claimant. 16 (ECF No. 137)
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant EpicentRx’s Ex Parte Application Pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 72, Local Rule 7.2, and Civil Standing Order § II, to Object to Magistrate’s Discovery Order Denying Protective Order [ECF 134] (“Ex Parte App.,” ECF No. 137). Defendant and Counter-Claimant Corey A. Carter, M.D. called chambers to inform the Court that he intended to file an opposition; however, given that the underlying depositions are scheduled to begin on December 8, 2021, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application both procedurally and on the merits without the benefit of…