Morgan
Morgan v. Rohr, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NATHANIEL MORGAN, an individual; Case No.: 20-cv-574-GPC-AHG MICHAEL BEVAN, an individual; 12 individually, and on behalf of others ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ similarly situated, MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A
THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
Plaintiffs,
v.
ROHR, INC., a corporation, and [ECF No. 74] HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND, a 17 corporation, d/b/a UTC AEROSPACE SYSTEMS d/b/a COLLINS AEROSPACE;
UNITED TECHNOLOGY
19 CORPORATION, a corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. 22 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint. ECF No. 74. Defendants opposed the motion, ECF No. 89, and Plaintiffs replied in support of their motion, ECF No. 92. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file an amended complaint. The Court further 27 finds this motion is suitable for disposition without a hearing under Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), and hereby VACATES…