Alegre

Alegre v. Contreras

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 14, 20213:16-cv-02442California4,144 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CINDY ALEGRE, et al., Case No.: 16-cv-2442-AJB-KSC Plaintiffs,

ORDER:

v. 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., (1) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION 14 Defendants. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; and 15 (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

18 (Doc. Nos. 176 & 183) 19 Presently before the Court is (1) Cindy Alegre, et. al.’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Summary Adjudication of Facts (Doc. No. 176); and (2) Defendants United States of America, Department of the Interior, and Individual Defendants Sally Jewell, Lawrence Roberts, and Michael Black’s (sued in their official capacities) (collectively, “Defendants”) motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 183.) The motions have been fully briefed. (Doc. Nos. 189, 190, 186, & 193.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. /// I. BACKGROUND The …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.