Frye

facts in Mr. Frye’s Motion to Dismiss, which confirm facts discussed in the Complaint. As 26 discussed below, that motion references many facts that were not discussed or referenced the Complaint. In reviewing that motion, the Court is mindful that “[a] document filed pro se is to be liberally construed ... and a pro se [pleading], however inartfully pleaded, be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.”

IHH is a California limited liability company organized in July 2019, with two ||managing members: Vincent Espinoza and Armand Nannicola.* Declaration of Armand ||Nannicola in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Order Authorizing Substitute Service of ||Summons, ECF No. 7-2 (“Nannicola Decl. No. 1”) at 1, {§ 1-2; Declaration of Vincent ||Espinoza in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Order Authorizing Substitute Service of ||Summons, ECF No. 7-3 (“Espinoza Decl. No. 1”) at 1, § 1. On October 23, 2019, at 10:32 a.m., Mr. Espinoza sent Mr. Frye an e-mail stating 8 || that IHH “would like to submit [a letter of intent] regarding 15…