Burgess

Burgess v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20213:21-cv-00616California5,119 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MATTHEW BURGESS Case No.: 21-cv-616-MMA (MSB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER: (1) GRANTING IN PART

v. AND DENYING IN PART

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., DISMISS, AND (2) GRANTING IN

PART AND DENYING IN PART

Defendants. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

STRIKE

16 [Doc. No. 14] 17 18 Plaintiff Matthew Burgess (“Plaintiff”) brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants City of San Diego (the “City”), Officer Jeremy Huff (“Huff”), and unidentified Does (collectively, “Defendants”). Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiff’s fourth, fifth, and sixth cause of action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and move to strike several allegations in the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f). See Doc. No. 14 at 1. Plaintiff filed an opposition to Defendants’ motion, to which Defendants replied. See Doc. Nos. 17,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.