Baize

Baize v. US District Court Southern District of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20213:21-cv-01823California1,808 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEBBIE BAIZE, Case No.: 21CV1823-GPC(MSB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS; SUA SPONTE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §

CALIFORNIA,

1915(E)(2)AND DENYING 16 Defendant. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL AS MOOT

18 [DKT. NOS. 2, 5.] 19 Plaintiff Debbie Baize, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against the United States District Court for the Southern District of California and a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Dkt. No. 1, Compl; Dkt. No. 2.) She subsequently filed a motion to appoint counsel. (Dkt. No. 5.) She also filed additional information to add to the “case file.” (Dkt. No. 7.) Based on the reasoning below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, sua sponte DISMISSES the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.