Escamilla Avina v. Patenaude & Felix, APC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JORGE ESCAMILLA AVINA, Case No. 20-cv-0166-BAS-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART PATENAUDE &

FELIX, APC AND CREDITOR

PATENAUDE & FELIX, APC, et al.,

CORP. SOLUTIONS INC.’S

Defendants. MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 38)

Before this Court is Defendants Patenaude & Felix, APC (“P&F”) and Credit Corp. Solutions, Inc. (“CCS” and, together with P&F, “Entity Defendants”)’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff Jorge Avina (“Plaintiff”)’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6) or, in the alternative, for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 (“Motion”). (Mot., ECF No. 38; Mem., Ex. 1 to Mot., ECF No. 38-1.) This Court previously held, inter alia, that Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) failed to state a claim against either Entity Defendant under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. §…