Highfields Capital I LP v. Seaworld Entertainment, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20213:18-cv-01276California698 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HIGHFIELDS CAPITAL I LLP, et al., Case No.: 18-cv-1276-MMA (AGS)

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO

Plaintiffs, FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL v. [Doc. Nos. 128, 130, 131, 133, 136, 138,

SEAWORLD ENTERTAINMENT, INC., 140, 142, 144, 146, 147, 149, 154, 156,

et al., 158, 160, 162, 164, 166, 168, 173] 15 Defendants. 16 17 Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, the parties’ Daubert motions, and various evidentiary objections. The parties seek to file various documents related to their motions, oppositions, replies, evidence, and objections under seal. The parties’ motions to seal are unopposed. When presented with a request to file a document under seal, the Court begins with the strong presumption in favor of the “general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.” Nixon v. Warner…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.