Highfields Capital I LP v. Seaworld Entertainment, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HIGHFIELDS CAPITAL I LLP, et al., Case No.: 18-cv-1276-MMA (AGS)
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO
Plaintiffs, FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL v. [Doc. Nos. 128, 130, 131, 133, 136, 138,
SEAWORLD ENTERTAINMENT, INC., 140, 142, 144, 146, 147, 149, 154, 156,
et al., 158, 160, 162, 164, 166, 168, 173] 15 Defendants. 16 17 Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, the parties’ Daubert motions, and various evidentiary objections. The parties seek to file various documents related to their motions, oppositions, replies, evidence, and objections under seal. The parties’ motions to seal are unopposed. When presented with a request to file a document under seal, the Court begins with the strong presumption in favor of the “general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.” Nixon v. Warner…