Guerrero

Guerrero v. United States Gypsum Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20213:21-cv-01502California2,009 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 MIGUEL GUERRERO, on behalf of Case No.: 21-cv-01502-GPC-JLB himself and all others similarly situated,

ORDER:

Plaintiffs, 14 v. (1) GRANTING IN PART JOINT

MOTION TO AMEND

UNITED STATES GYPSUM

SCHEDULING ORDER; AND COMPANY, et al.,

17 Defendants. (2) ISSUING AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER

19 [ECF Nos. 13; 19] 20 21 22 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Amend Scheduling Order, wherein the parties seek to extend all remaining dates in the Scheduling Order by 90 days. (ECF No. 19.) The parties set forth that good cause exists for their requested extensions because they are actively pursuing settlement and have a private mediation date set for February 3, 2022. (Id. at 4.) Although the parties “have completed much of their discovery (and will complete more ahead of mediation),” they assert that they “need a little additional time to pursue mediation without incurring unnecessary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.