Fisher

(HC) Rodriguez v. Fisher

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20213:21-cv-01395California2,191 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PEDRO RODRIGUEZ, Case No.: 3:21-cv-01395-JLS-AHG

Petitioner,

REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION FOR

ORDER DENYING

KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary,

PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR

Respondent. ORDER DIRECTING SHERIFF

TO RECOGNIZE PETITIONER

AS PRO SE LITIGANT

17 [ECF No. 20] 18 Petitioner Pedro Rodriguez (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF Nos. 1, 7. Before the Court is Petitioner’s Ex Parte Motion for Order Directing Sheriff William Gore to Recognize Petitioner as Pro Se Litigant and Grant Petitioner the Same Privileges as Other Self-Represented Prisoners. ECF No. 20. Petitioner seeks an order from the Court compelling Sheriff William Gore to provide Petitioner with law library access, unrestricted correspondence to the courts, copy services, Lexis Nexis access, and access to his own legal work…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.