Kinsey

Kinsey v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20213:20-cv-00941California11,384 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 Patrick Charles KINSEY, Case No.: 20-cv-00941-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S Andrew SAUL,

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

Defendant. JUDGMENT [ECF No. 19];

12 (2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 22]; AND

(3) REMANDING FOR FURTHER

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS

I. INTRODUCTION On May 20, 2020, Plaintiff Patrick Charles Kinsey (“Plaintiff” or “Claimant”), proceeding pro se, filed his Complaint seeking judicial review of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s (“Defendant” or “Commissioner”) denial of his disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. (ECF No. 1.) On May 29, 2020, this Court issued an order granting Plaintiff’s IFP motion. (ECF No. 4.) Although the 24 25 1 The Court cites the electronic CM/ECF pagination for citations. 27 Commissioner filed the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.