Quilalang

Homa Property Investments Corp. v. Quilalang

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20213:21-cv-02089California1,051 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HOMA PROPERTY INVESTMENTS Case No.: 3:21-CV-2089-CAB-BGS

CORPORATION,

ORDER OF REMAND TO STATE

Plaintiff, COURT v.

JACKIE QUILALANG,

15 Defendant. 16 17 18 On September 13, 2021, Plaintiff filed a complaint for unlawful detainer against Defendant Jackie Quilalang. [Doc. No. 1-2 at 4.] On December 15, 2021, Quilalang, proceeding pro se, removed the action to this court. [Doc. No. 1.] After reviewing the notice of removal and the underlying complaint, the Court finds that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this case. Accordingly, the Court REMANDS this action to state court. A suit filed in state court may be removed to federal court by the defendant or defendants if the federal court would have had original subject matter jurisdiction over that suit. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a); Moore-Thomas v. Alaska Airlines, Inc., 553 F.3d 1241, 1243 (9th Cir. 2009). On the other hand, “[i]f at any time before final judgment it appears that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.