Strojnik

Strojnik v. Village 1017 Coronado, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20213:19-cv-02210California5,914 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PETER STROJNIK, Case No. 19-cv-02210-BAS-MSB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER: v. (1) GRANTING REQUEST TO VILLAGE 1107 CORONADO, INC., RECONSIDER CONTEMPT Defendant. RULINGS (ECF No. 51);

15 (2) VACATING CONTEMPT RULINGS (ECF Nos. 44, 45, 56);

17 (3) TERMINATING AS MOOT MOTIONS TO STAY (ECF Nos. 50, 57); AND

(4) TERMINATING AS MOOT

SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION

21 FOR CONTEMPT (ECF No. 61) 22 Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Peter Strojnik, Sr.’s request to reconsider the Court’s contempt rulings (ECF No. 51) and the parties’ other contempt-related motions (ECF Nos. 50, 57, 61). This action started as an unremarkable disability discrimination case. It took a turn when the Court ordered Mr. Strojnik to pay Defendant $21,995 in attorney’s fees under the Americans with Disabilities Act’s fee-shifting provision for filing a …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.