Pina

Pina v. Sacuan Security and Police

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20213:21-cv-01577California3,421 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT ANTHONY PIÑA, Case No.: 3:21-cv-01577-JAH-BLM

CDCR #BN-1661,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

SACUAN SECURITY & POLICE;

[ECF No. 2]

SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT,

16 Defendants. AND 17 2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR

FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) AND 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) 20 21 Plaintiff Robert Anthony Piña, while incarcerated at Kern Valley State Prison (“KVSP”) in Delano, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights Complaint (“Compl.”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See ECF No. 1, “Compl.” at 1.) Piña claims Sacuan Security and Police1 and the San Diego Police Department (“SDPD”) violated his 26 27 1 The Court presumes Plaintiff means to refer to the Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation, 28 “legal rights” on an unspecified occasion when an unidentified security guard assaulted him at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.