Bartle

Bartle v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 14, 20213:20-cv-01431California455 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHAD B., Case No.: 20cv1431-CAB-MSB

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION [Doc. No. 13]

REGARDING JOINT MOTION FOR

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Commissioner of REVIEW [Doc. No. 12] Social Security, 15 Defendant.

18 Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of 19 Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg, filed on November 29, 2021, regarding the Joint 20 Motion for Judicial Review [Doc. No. 12], recommending that the Court reverse the 21 Commissioner’s decision, and enter judgment reversing the decision of the 22 Commissioner and remanding this matter for further administrative proceedings pursuant 23 to sentence four of 42 U.S.C.§405(g). [Doc. No. 13.] 24 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) set forth a district 25 court’s duties in connection with a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. The 26 district court must “make a de novo determination of those portion of the report to which 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.