Fisher

(HC) Rodriguez v. Fisher

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20213:21-cv-01442California1,514 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PEDRO RODRIGUEZ, Case No.: 21cv1442-BAS (MSB)

Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING

v. PETITIONER’S EX PARTE

REQUEST FOR ORDER

WARDEN FISHER,

DIRECTING SAN DIEGO

Respondent. SHERIFFS TO RECOGNIZE

PETITIONER AS PRO PER

LITIGANT [ECF NO. 18]

17 18 Pedro Rodriguez (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 1.) Respondent has until January 21, 2022, to file a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 23 at 2.) As presently scheduled, Petitioner will then have until February 23, 2022, to file an opposition. (Id.) On November 16, 2021, Petitioner filed an “Ex Parte Request for Order Directing San Diego Sheriffs to Recognize Petitioner as Pro Per Litigant.” (ECF No. 18.) In his ex parte motion, Petitioner indicates that since he was transferred from Valley State Prison to the custody of the San Diego Sheriff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.