Escamilla Avina v. Patenaude & Felix, APC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JORGE ESCAMILLA AVINA, Case No. 20-cv-0166-BAS-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF

v. TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL CIVIL RULE 15.1(c) PATENAUDE & FELIX, APC, et al.,

Defendants. 16 Pending before this Court is Defendants’ Patenaude & Felix, APC and Credit Corp. Solutions, Inc. (“Entity Defendants”)’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff Jorge Escamilla Avina’s Second Amended Complaint (Second Am. Compl. (“SAC”), ECF No. 25). (Mot. to Dismiss, ECF No. 38.) Plaintiff filed the SAC after the Court dismissed without prejudice the lone Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) claim lodged against the Entity Defendants in the First Amended Complaint (First Am. Compl., (“FAC”), ECF No. 9). (Order, ECF No. 23.)1 Under the local civil rules of this district, “[a]ny amended pleading filed after the granting of a motion to dismiss . . . with leave to amend[] must be accompanied by a version of that pleading that…