Staublein

Staublein v. Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20223:18-cv-01647California7,292 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IN RE ACADIA PHARMACEUTICALS Case No.: 18-cv-01647-AJB-BGS

INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS THE THIRD

AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT

LEAVE TO AMEND

15 (Doc. No. 107) 16 17 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) in this securities-fraud action. (Doc. No. 107.) Plaintiff filed an opposition, to which Defendants replied. (Doc. Nos. 108, 109.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background This case is a putative class action, involving a class of individuals who acquired ACADIA securities between April 29, 2016, and July 9, 2018, and are suing Defendants— Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Acadia”), and individuals Stephen R. Davis (“Davis”), Todd S. Young (“Young”), Srdjan Stankovic (“Stankovic”), Terrance Moore…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.