Blackshire

Blackshire v. Buca Restaurants 2, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20223:21-cv-01505California3,085 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT BLACKSHIRE, JR., Case No.: 21-cv-01505-JLS-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR

v. LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS AND FOR

BUCA RESTAURANTS 2, INC., et al.,

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

Defendants. [ECF Nos. 2; 3] 16 Presently before the Court are pro se Plaintiff Robert Blackshire, Jr.’s motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 2; 2-1) and for appointment of counsel pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1) (ECF No. 3). The Court construes Plaintiff’s pro se Complaint to assert, inter alia,1 workplace discrimination claims pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 against his employer, Defendant Buca Restaurants 2, Inc. (See, e.g., ECF No. 1 at 10.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motions without prejudice.

25 Plaintiff also appears to assert claims against Ana Sepulveda for issuing a “fraudulent” right to sue …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.