Frye

Indian Hills Holdings, LLC v. Frye

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20213:20-cv-00461California10,594 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

BACKGROUND

This case involves a tripartite relationship pursuant to which IHH paid Defendants ||to purchase Cultivation “Adult” Extreme Cubes (the “Cubes”),! and Defendants, in turn, g ||contracted with ICT Centurion Investments, LLC, a suspended Colorado limited □□□□□□□□□ |}company (“ICT”)’, to sell Defendants the Cubes it planned to sell to Plaintiff. Motion, 10 || ECF No. 15 (“Mot.”) at 2:4-14. When ICT rescinded its contract with Defendants and sold Cubes to another party, Defendants were unable to deliver the Cubes to Plaintiff but refused to refund the amount Plaintiff had already paid. Id. A more detailed factual history was included in the Court’s most recent order on ||PlaintifP's Motion for Default Judgment and is incorporated herein. See Indian Hills 15 || Holdings, LLC v. Christopher Frye, No. 3:20-cv-00461-BEN-AHG, 2021 WL 5360956, at ||*2-5 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2021). As pertains to the instant Motion, on August 5, 2021, Plaintiff filed a Request to ||Enter CDP’s Default on the basis that CDP failed to file a responsive pleading within || twenty-one (21) days. ECF No, …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.