Witt
Witt v. Bristol Farms
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SALIMA WITT, Case No. 21-cv-00411-BAS-AGS
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. ex parte APPLICATION FOR ORDER
DIRECTING ENTRY OF FINAL
BRISTOL FARMS, et al., JUDGMENT (ECF No. 21) Defendants.
16 17 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Salima Witt (“Witt”) sued Defendants UC San Diego Health, University of California Health (together, “Regents of the University of California”), and Bristol Farms, raising claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) Witt alleges that Defendants discriminated against her by denying her request to be exempted from their policies requiring everyone entering the facilities to wear facial masks to prevent the spread of COVID-19. (Id.) On November 9, 2021, the Court granted Regents of the University of California’s Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 15.) Defendant Bristol Farm’s Rule 12(b)(6)…