Arellano

Arellano v. Santos

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 30, 20213:18-cv-02391California2,497 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAUL ARELLANO, Case No.: 3:18-cv-2391-BTM-WVG

CDCR #AH-1995,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

Plaintiff, MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION vs. AND GRANTING MOTION

FOR COPIES

Dr. MICHAEL BALBIN SANTOS, 15 Defendant. [ECF Nos. 100, 103] 16 17 This case involves Plaintiff Raul Arellano’s First and Eighth Amendment claims against Dr. Michael Balbin Santos, a Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) doctor who is alleged to have tapered and/or terminated his prescription for Gabapentin during the months of May through September 2018. See Compl., ECF No. 1 at 3; ECF No. at 2‒5. On November 4, 2021, the Court granted Defendant Santos’s Motion for Summary Judgment in its entirety and entered judgment on his behalf. See ECF Nos. 91, 92. Plaintiff has since filed a Notice of Appeal (“NOA”) (ECF No. 101); but currently pending before this Court are his simultaneously-filed Motions for Reconsideration and for 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.