Dotzenroth
Wagner Aeronautical, Inc. v. Dotzenroth
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WAGNER AERONAUTICAL, INC.; Case No.: 21cv0994-L-AGS
MAMMOTH FREIGHTERS LLC;
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
WILLIAM WAGNER; and WILLIAM PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE
PLEADINGS AS MOOT
TARPLEY,
[ECF NO. 96] Plaintiffs, vs. 18 DAVID DOTZENROTH; SEQUOIA AIRCRAFT CONVERSIONS, LLC; CAI CONSULTING LTD; CHARLES WILEY DOTZENROTH; ANDREW MANSELL; STEVEN WELO; and DOES 1 through 50 inclusive, 25 Defendants 26 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Partial Judgment on the 27 Pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). [ECF No. 96.] Plaintiff 28 1 || timely filed an amended complaint [ECF No. 132]. See Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 15(a)(1)(B). 2 || "Rule 12(c) is functionally identical to Rule 12(b)(6) and ... the same standard of review 3 || applies to motions brought under either rule.” See United States ex rel. Cafasso v. Gen 4 || Dynamics C4 Sys., Inc., 637 F.3d 1047, 1054 n.4 (9th…