Morales-Alfaro
Morales-Alfaro v. CoreCivic, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUBIA MABEL MORALES- Case No.: 3:20-cv-00082-LAB (BGS)
ALFARO
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT
Plaintiff, CORECIVIC, INC.’S MOTION TO v. STRIKE ALLEGATIONS IN
PLAINTIFF’S FOURTH AMENDED
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
COMPLAINT [Dkt. 52] OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et
al., Defendants. 18 19 Defendant CoreCivic, Inc. (“CoreCivic”) has moved to strike allegations in Plaintiff’s Fourth Amended Complaint (“Motion”). (Dkt. 52). Under Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, CoreCivic asks the Court to strike Paragraphs 3, 45–49, 51–53, 59–64, 75, 76, 84–89, 92–116, 125, 130–40, and 181, arguing that the paragraphs are “rife with irrelevant, impertinent, and scandalous allegations that have no bearing on [Morales-Alfaro’s] claims and serve only to smear and defame CoreCivic.” (Id. at 1). Plaintiff Rubia Mabel Morales-Alfaro opposes the Motion, (Dkt. 58), and the Court …