Erhart

Erhart v. Bofi Holding Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20223:15-cv-02287California1,740 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12 CHARLES MATTHEW ERHART, Case No. 15-cv-02287-BAS-NLS consolidated with Plaintiff, 15-cv-02353-BAS-NLS

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. BOFI’S MOTION IN LIMINE

BOFI HOLDING, INC., NO. 2 TO EXCLUDE

INFLAMMATORY EVIDENCE

Defendant. THAT IS UNTETHERED TO

ERHART’S CLAIMS

(ECF Nos. 215, 232) And Consolidated Case 19 20 Presently before the Court is BofI Holding, Inc.’s Motion in Limine No. 2 to Exclude Inflammatory Evidence that Is Untethered to Erhart’s Claims. (ECF Nos. 215, 232.) Erhart opposes. (ECF No. 223.) The Court heard argument on the motion. (ECF No. 230.) For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART BofI’s Motion in Limine No. 2. 26 27 I. BACKGROUND The Court and the parties are familiar with the story behind these consolidated cases awaiting trial. Early on in this case, the Court discussed the scope of Erhart’s federal whistleblower…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.