Erhart
Erhart v. Bofi Holding Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12 CHARLES MATTHEW ERHART, Case No. 15-cv-02287-BAS-NLS consolidated with Plaintiff, 15-cv-02353-BAS-NLS
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
v. BOFI’S MOTION IN LIMINE
BOFI HOLDING, INC., NO. 2 TO EXCLUDE
INFLAMMATORY EVIDENCE
Defendant. THAT IS UNTETHERED TO
ERHART’S CLAIMS
(ECF Nos. 215, 232) And Consolidated Case 19 20 Presently before the Court is BofI Holding, Inc.’s Motion in Limine No. 2 to Exclude Inflammatory Evidence that Is Untethered to Erhart’s Claims. (ECF Nos. 215, 232.) Erhart opposes. (ECF No. 223.) The Court heard argument on the motion. (ECF No. 230.) For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART BofI’s Motion in Limine No. 2. 26 27 I. BACKGROUND The Court and the parties are familiar with the story behind these consolidated cases awaiting trial. Early on in this case, the Court discussed the scope of Erhart’s federal whistleblower…