Erhart
Erhart v. Bofi Holding Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11 CHARLES MATTHEW ERHART, Case No. 15-cv-02287-BAS-NLS consolidated with Plaintiff, 15-cv-02353-BAS-NLS
ORDER DENYING BOFI’S
v. MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 4 TO
BOFI HOLDING, INC., EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF
CONDUCT AND STATEMENTS
Defendant. THAT ARE NOT ACTIONABLE (ECF No. 220) 17 And Consolidated Case 18 19 Presently before the Court is BofI Holding, Inc.’s Motion in Limine No. 4 to Exclude Evidence of Conduct and Statements that Are Not Actionable. (ECF No. 220.) Erhart opposes. (ECF No. 223.) The Court heard argument on the motion. (ECF No. 230.) For the following reasons, the Court DENIES BofI’s Motion in Limine No. 4. I. BACKGROUND The Court and the parties are familiar with the story behind these consolidated cases awaiting trial. Erhart has whistleblower retaliation claims and a defamation Erhart asserts that some of BofI’s retaliatory conduct occurred after his employment…