Dennis

Dennis v. Good Deal Charlie, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20223:21-cv-01760California4,201 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELAINE DENNIS and COURTNEY Case No.: 21-cv-01760-BEN-JLB WHITE, on behalf of themselves and 12 others similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA Plaintiffs,

AND FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER

14 v. [ECF No. 1] GOOD DEAL CHARLIE, INC., et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Before the Court is a Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum to Non-Party Investigator Wolfram Worms and for a Protective Order (the “Motion”) filed by Plaintiffs Elaine Dennis and Courtney White (“Plaintiffs”). (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiffs seek to quash a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure subpoena served on their non-party investigator Wolfram Worms by Defendant Good Deal Charlie, Inc. (“Defendant”) in the underlying action pending in the Northern District of Oklahoma, Dennis, et al. v. Good Deal Charlie, Inc., et al., Case No. 20-cv-00295-GKF-JFJ (N.D. Okla. 2020). (Id.) Plaintiffs also request a protective order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.