Jacome

Jacome v. IRS of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20223:21-cv-02083California725 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEXANDER JACOME, Case No.: 21cv2083-JLS (MSB)

CDCR #BD-1845,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

Petitioner, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS vs. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)

15 IRS OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Respondents. 17 18 19 On December 2, 2021, Petitioner Alexander Jacome, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this action pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, but failed to pay the $402 civil filing fee or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF No. 1.) Petitioner sought a writ of mandate from this Court directing his early release from state custody and requiring payment of his “stimulus money.” (Id. at 1–3.) On December 16, 2021, the Court dismissed this action without prejudice for failure to satisfy the filing fee requirement. (ECF No. 2.) Petitioner was instructed that he was required to either pay the entire filing fee or submit a request to proceed IFP on or before 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.