Erhart
Erhart v. Bofi Holding Inc.
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 20223:15-cv-02287California1,248 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11 CHARLES MATTHEW ERHART, Case No. 15-cv-02287-BAS-NLS consolidated with Plaintiff, 15-cv-02353-BAS-NLS
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
v. BOFI’S MOTION IN LIMINE
BOFI HOLDING, INC., NO. 3 TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE
OF PREDICATES OF ALLEGED
Defendant. WRONGDOING THAT THE
COURT HAS ALREADY
REJECTED (ECF No. 218) And Consolidated Case 18 19 Presently before the Court is BofI Holding, Inc.’s Motion in Limine No. 3 to Exclude Evidence of Predicates of Alleged Wrongdoing that the Court Has Already Rejected. (ECF No. 218.) Erhart opposes. (ECF No. 223.) The Court heard argument on the motion. (ECF No. 230.) For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART BofI’s Motion in Limine No. 3. I. BACKGROUND The Court and the parties are familiar with the story behind these consolidated cases awaiting trial. Erhart claims the Bank violated state and federal anti-retaliation 1…