Erhart

Erhart v. Bofi Holding Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 20223:15-cv-02287California1,248 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 CHARLES MATTHEW ERHART, Case No. 15-cv-02287-BAS-NLS consolidated with Plaintiff, 15-cv-02353-BAS-NLS

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. BOFI’S MOTION IN LIMINE

BOFI HOLDING, INC., NO. 3 TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE

OF PREDICATES OF ALLEGED

Defendant. WRONGDOING THAT THE

COURT HAS ALREADY

REJECTED (ECF No. 218) And Consolidated Case 18 19 Presently before the Court is BofI Holding, Inc.’s Motion in Limine No. 3 to Exclude Evidence of Predicates of Alleged Wrongdoing that the Court Has Already Rejected. (ECF No. 218.) Erhart opposes. (ECF No. 223.) The Court heard argument on the motion. (ECF No. 230.) For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART BofI’s Motion in Limine No. 3. I. BACKGROUND The Court and the parties are familiar with the story behind these consolidated cases awaiting trial. Erhart claims the Bank violated state and federal anti-retaliation 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.