Erhart

Erhart v. Bofi Holding Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20223:15-cv-02287California3,288 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 CHARLES MATTHEW ERHART, Case No. 15-cv-02287-BAS-NLS consolidated with Plaintiff, 15-cv-02353-BAS-NLS

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 5 TO

BOFI HOLDING, INC., EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF ANY

DAMAGES THAT REQUIRE

Defendant. COMPUTATION (ECF No. 221)

16 And Consolidated Case 17 18 Presently before the Court is BofI Holding, Inc. (“BofI” or “Bank”)’s Motion in Limine No. 5 to Exclude Evidence of Any Damages that Require Computation. (Mot., ECF No. 221.) Charles Matthew Erhart opposes. (Opp’n, ECF No. 223.) The Court heard argument on the motion. (ECF No. 230; see also Hr’g Tr., ECF No. 234.) For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART BofI’s Motion in Limine No. 5. I. BACKGROUND The Court and the parties are familiar with the story behind these consolidated cases. After extensive discovery and motion practice, the cases now await trial. government. He brings claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.