Haynes

Haynes v. Juarez

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20223:19-cv-02380California488 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HERMAN T. HAYNES, Case No. 19-cv-2380-BAS-MSB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING JOINT

v. MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 55)

H. ASBURY, et al.,

Defendants.

17 Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to dismiss this prisoner civil rights action 18 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 41(a)(2) (see Compl., ECF No.1). 19 (Mot., ECF No. 55.) On November 3, 2021, the parties resolved this matter by settlement, 20 the terms of which were placed on the record during a settlement conference before the 21 Honorable Michael S. Berg, United States Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 54.) In compliance 22 with Judge Berg’s directives, the parties filed their joint motion on January 10, 2022, 23 seeking to dismiss with prejudice this entire action. (Mot.) 24 “Except as provided in Rule 41(a)(1), an action may be dismissed at the plaintiff’s 25 request only by court order, or on terms that the court considers proper.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.