Dotzenroth

Wagner Aeronautical, Inc. v. Dotzenroth

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 20223:21-cv-00994California1,979 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WAGNER AERONAUTICAL, INC., et Case No.: 21-cv-0994-L-AGS al., ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR

Plaintiffs,

RELEASE OF BUSINESS PLANS

v. UNDER IN CAMERA REVIEW (ECF 172) AND MOTION TO SEAL David DOTZENROTH, et al., (ECF 173) Defendants. 9 Plaintiffs moved for a temporary injunction against the Dotzenroth defendants. (See ECF 161.) To defend that motion, defendants seek “the release of copies of plaintiffs’ business plans submitted to the Court for in camera review.” (ECF 172, at 3.) Because the Court finds those documents relevant and proportional to the needs of the case, the Court GRANTS the motion. BACKGROUND According to plaintiffs, back in 2017 or 2018, plaintiffs William Wagner and William Tarpley began collaborating with defendant David Dotzenroth to design a passenger-to-freighter jumbo-jet conversion program. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.