Doe
Doe v. Bonta
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JANE DOE, et al. CASE NO. 22-cv-10-LAB (DEB)
Plaintiffs,
ORDER:
vs. 1) DENYING APPLICATION FOR ROB BONTA, in his capacity as Attorney TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER General of the State of California, et al. [Dkt. 9]; 13 Defendants. 2) CONDITIONALLY GRANTING
MOTION TO PROCEED
PSEUDONYMOUSLY [Dkt. 11];
16 3) SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; and 18 4) SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS
Plaintiffs Jane Doe and John Doe Nos. 1 through 4 filed an ex parte Application for a Temporary Restraining Order and an Order to Show Cause Re: Preliminary Injunction (“TRO Application”) and an ex parte Motion for a Protective Order and to Proceed Using Pseudonyms. Defendant Rob Bonta, in his capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, filed briefs in opposition to both motions. For the…