Guy

Guy v. Lorenzen

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20223:20-cv-02027California483 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEOVANTE L. GUY, Case No. 20-cv-02027-BAS-BLM

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. UNOPPOSED MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT (ECF No. 38) MATTHEW LORENZEN, et al.,

Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Deovante L. Guy’s unopposed, amended motion for leave to file Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”). (ECF No. 38.) Through the amendment, Guy seeks to substitute the following individuals as Does 1, 2, and 3: San Diego Police Officers Paul MacIntyre, Christopher Senior, and Cory Sims. (Id.) Plaintiff represents that the true names of these officers were unknown to him until their identities were revealed through discovery. (Id.) Civil Local Rule 7.1(e)(2) provides that a party opposing a motion must file either an opposition or a statement of non-opposition no later than fourteen calendar days prior to the noticed hearing date. If a party fails to comply with this rule, “that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.