Carroll

Carroll v. California Department of Corrections

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20223:19-cv-02126California906 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 ABONILICO CARROLL, Case No.: 19-cv-2126-JO-KSC

14 Plaintiff, FURTHER ORDER REGARDING v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

COMPEL DEPOSITION OF

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

WARDEN AND CHIEF MEDICAL

CORRECTIONS, et al., OFFICER Defendants.

[Doc. No. 79] 20 Plaintiff Abonilico Carroll is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 4, 2021, plaintiff filed a motion regarding several discovery issues (the “Discovery Motion”). Doc. No. 79. On November 10, 2021, the undersigned denied plaintiff’s requests, set forth in the Discovery Motion, to extend the pretrial deadlines set forth in the Court’s May 7, 2021 Scheduling Order [Doc. No. 40] by 30 to 45 days. Doc. No. 85. The Court also advised plaintiff that the Warden and Chief Medical Officer (“CMO”) of Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”), where plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.