McAleenan

Al Otro Lado, Inc. v. McAleenan

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20223:17-cv-02366California3,895 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AL OTRO LADO, INC. et al., Case No.: 3:17-cv-02366-BAS-KSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’

v. PROPOSED DISCOVERY REQUESTS [Doc. No. 776] AND CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary, U.S.

DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO

Department of Homeland Security, in his PLAINTIFFS’ PROPOSED official capacity, et al., DISCOVERY REQUESTS [Doc. No. 16 Defendants. 785]

Before the Court is plaintiffs’ Notice of Filing Discovery Requests Pursuant to Docket No. 760 [Doc. No. 776] and defendants’ Opposition thereto [Doc. No. 785]. Doc. No. 760 is, in part, the District Court’s Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Discovery (“Order”). Plaintiffs’ proposed Discovery Requests [Doc. No. 776] and defendants’ Opposition thereto [Doc. No. 785] have been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge for consideration. For the reasons outlined more fully below, the Court finds that defendants’ request to “disapprove and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.