Gastelum

Gastelum v. HEES II

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20223:21-cv-01337California2,852 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FERNANDO GASTELUM, Case No.: 21-CV-1337 JLS (RBB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) SCREENING

v. PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED

COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO

HEES II dba Big 5 Sporting Goods – 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); (2) GRANTING San Diego, PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR Defendant. ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS; AND 16 (3) DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE TO EFFECT SERVICE

OF AMENDED COMPLAINT

(ECF Nos. 7, 8) 20 Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Fernando Gastelum’s Amended Complaint (“Am. Compl.,” ECF No. 7) and Request for Issuance of Summons (“Req.,” ECF No. 8). Having carefully considered Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint and the applicable law, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Request and DIRECTS the U.S. Marshal Service to effect service of the Amended Complaint. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this action on July…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.