Fisher

(HC) Rodriguez v. Fisher

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20223:21-cv-01443California857 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PEDRO RODRIGUEZ, Case No.: 21-CV-1443-MMA(WVG)

Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

v. EX PARTE REQUEST FOR ORDER

DIRECTING SAN DIEGO SHERIFFS

KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary,

TO RECOGNIZE PETITIONER AS

Respondent. PRO PER LITIGANT

16 [ECF No. 34] 17 18 Pedro Rodriguez (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 1.) Petitioner has also filed “motion for order directing Sheriffs to recognize Petitioners [sic] pro se status under Bounds v. Smith.” (ECF No. 34.) He explains he has “been continuously quarantined [as a result of the ongoing global pandemic], continuously denied law library access and caselaw, and denied access to his own legal work product and reference books.” (Id. at 1.) He also engages in other unrelated discussions about his parole eligibility, which is the subject of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.