Georges

Georges v. Phillip

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20213:21-cv-02095California2,024 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AGNES GEORGES Case No.: 21cv2095-LAB (WVG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA

FELIX PHILLIP

PAUPERIS (DKT. 2);

Defendant. 2) DENYING APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL (DKT. 3); AND

16 3) DISMISSING COMPLAINT (DKT. 1)

Plaintiff Agnes Georges, proceeding pro se, filed her Complaint against Defendant Felix Phillip on December 16, 2021. (Dkt. 1). She attempts to bring a Fourteenth Amendment claim against Phillip, a Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) agent, because he allegedly stole her ID in 2008. The circumstances underlying her constitutional claim are unclear, and the relief she seeks is either incomprehensible or impermissible. Georges did not pay the statutory and administrative civil filing fees required by U.S.C. § 1914(a). Instead, Georges seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.