Georges
Georges v. Phillip
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20213:21-cv-02095California2,024 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AGNES GEORGES Case No.: 21cv2095-LAB (WVG)
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA
FELIX PHILLIP
PAUPERIS (DKT. 2);
Defendant. 2) DENYING APPOINTMENT OF
COUNSEL (DKT. 3); AND
16 3) DISMISSING COMPLAINT (DKT. 1)
Plaintiff Agnes Georges, proceeding pro se, filed her Complaint against Defendant Felix Phillip on December 16, 2021. (Dkt. 1). She attempts to bring a Fourteenth Amendment claim against Phillip, a Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) agent, because he allegedly stole her ID in 2008. The circumstances underlying her constitutional claim are unclear, and the relief she seeks is either incomprehensible or impermissible. Georges did not pay the statutory and administrative civil filing fees required by U.S.C. § 1914(a). Instead, Georges seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis…