Jacome

Jacome v. IRS of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20223:21-cv-02083California784 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEXANDER JACOME, Case No.: 21-CV 2083 JLS (MSB)

CDCR #BD-1845,

ORDER (1) DENYING MOTION TO

Petitioner, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS v. AND (2) GRANTING MOTION TO

AMEND/CORRECT

15 IRS OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Respondents. 17 18 19 On December 2, 2021, Petitioner Alexander Jacome (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this action pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, but failed to pay the $402 civil filing fee or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). See ECF No. 1 (“Pet.”). Petitioner sought a writ of mandate from this Court directing his early release from state custody and requiring payment of his “stimulus money.” Id. at 1–3. On December 16, 2021, the Court dismissed this action without prejudice for failure to satisfy the filing fee requirement. See ECF No. 2. The December 16, 2021 Order / / / instructed Petitioner that he was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.