Hicks

Hicks v. Shakiba

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20223:21-cv-01867California2,136 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL HICKS, Case No.: 21-CV-1867 JLS (AGS)

CDCR # B-80852,

ORDER (1) DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS v. AS BARRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

AND (2) DISMISSING CIVIL

ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PAY PEYMAN SHAKIBA, et al., FILING FEE REQUIRED BY 28 16 U.S.C. § 1914(a) Defendants. 17 (ECF No. 2)

19

Plaintiff Michael Hicks, proceeding pro se and currently incarcerated at Richard J. Donovan State Prison (“RJD”), has filed a civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”). Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee required to commence a civil action; instead, he has filed a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See ECF No. 2 (“IFP Mot.”). / / / / / / / / / MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS I. Standard of Review “All persons, not just prisoners, may seek…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.