Woolsey
Woolsey v. County of San Diego
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ERIC WOOLSEY, Case No.: 3:21-cv-00877-BEN-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER
v. (1) GRANTING IN PART JOINT COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE JACK REED, and DOES 1–25, MANAGEMENT DEADLINES, and
Defendants. (2) ISSUING FIRST AMENDED
SCHEDULING ORDER
[ECF No. 22]
20 Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to continue case management deadlines. ECF No. 22. The parties seek to extend all deadlines set forth in the Court’s Scheduling Order (ECF No. 16) by approximately 60 days. ECF No. 22 at 2. Parties seeking to modify the scheduling order under Rule 16(b) must demonstrate good cause. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent”); ECF No. 16 at 5 (scheduling order, stating that the “dates and times set forth herein will not be modified except for good cause shown”); Chmb.R. at 28 …